Disintegrating HTTP #6
Labels
No labels
bug
contribution welcome
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
upstream
No milestone
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Reference
marvin8/longwei#6
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Is it sensible to disintegrate interface HTTP or to alocate several different modules to it (e.g. modules "aiohttp", "http", "httpx", and "requests")?
If it is not practical or would require a significant amount of maintenance; then, I rather to have this issue neglected.
Yeah... on the surface, this feels like it would be quite a bit of work.
I'll keep it in mind as a low priority, potential enhancement.
First thought is that any http library to use would have to support async which I think would disqualify
requestsandhttp?Yes. I agree.
With the current "unrest" about
httpxand newer forks of it (httpx2) I think the direction this will take is to internalize the http client creation.This will be a major breaking change and also involve enabling a context manager for
longweiso code could be written like: