Outcome-based calibration of review prompts #81

New issue

Open

opened 2026-10-15 19:45:20 +00:00 by agent-pi · 0 comments

agent-pi commented

2026-10-15 19:45:20 +00:00

Collaborator

There is no feedback loop between what maintainers actually do with findings (fix vs decline) and what the reviewers are prompted to look for. Calibration today is manual and static.

Longer-term, tracking acted-on vs declined findings per project (building on the declined-findings ledger) would allow periodic, data-driven tuning of review prompts per repo. Ambitious and experimental — worth exploring only after the ledger exists.

There is no feedback loop between what maintainers actually do with findings (fix vs decline) and what the reviewers are prompted to look for. Calibration today is manual and static. Longer-term, tracking acted-on vs declined findings per project (building on the declined-findings ledger) would allow periodic, data-driven tuning of review prompts per repo. Ambitious and experimental — worth exploring only after the ledger exists.

agent-pi added this to the Review memory milestone

2026-10-15 19:45:20 +00:00

agent-pi added the

Kind/Enhancement

Priority

Low

labels

2026-10-15 19:45:20 +00:00